QUOTE(Chris E @ Oct 21 2009, 04:21 AM)

Yes, a culture that the cyclists themselves have a big hand in shaping. Let's all get outraged by people choosing their profession and how they conduct it.

This is just a quick reply, if I have more time I'll respond later. Fear the pedant!
IF doping is a societal (and I think it is), in which young children are habituated to make the wrong choices, establishing courses of action that will govern their adult lives and moral decisions made at that time, then, yes, I do get outraged, or, better, since I am not an agry man, depressed, by news of this sort. VDB "chose" to dope, probably, IMO, whatever limiters I have to put on this kind of hypothesis, at a young age, probably young enough that he hadn't reached the age of consent, and surrounded by advisors who were pushing him the wrong way. Once he hit that path, 'nuff said, it's hard to go back.
That said, I sometimes wonder if I would have made the same decisions he made. Ask any elite athlete if they would take a prodcut which was banned, undetectable, would guarantee them 10 years of glory and fame of thighest order, but they would die at the age of 35? They'd take it. It's a system that they have a part in shaping, yes, but it's tragic nonetheless. just ask Achilles. Or anyone else who's made the glory choice when young. Oh, wait, you can't; they're dead.
-lochness
editing to add: Why is it that I get depressed by VdB's death, but just basically po'd by the lanceness? Maybe I see a distinction between the doping pioneers and the doping followers? Or maybe it's just that Lance is still enjoying his moment of koros, and hubris has yet to bring him down. or maybe Lance is like Agamemnon, with whom I've never sympathised, and VdB is like Achilles. Or maybe I'm just a hypocrite, and I'll be equally depressed if (when?) Lance develops an unusual hormonal condition that does awful things to one's body and is usually only found in lab rats and workers in vinyl factories.