Going further along on what Steve wrote and my own opinion is:
floyd has signed on as a forum member and thus has member rights like everyone else. He has shown respect for others and should receive likewise in return. As for rule 2.2:
QUOTE(general forum rule 2.2)
When debating a topic make sure that you focus on what is being said, not who is saying it. In short, debate the argument, not the person. Personal attacks when you are losing (or winning!) a debate aren't acceptable.
floyd's rights here (as a member) clash with him being (an athlete and thus a performer and thus) a legitimate topic of discussion. I will be resolving that clash by ensuring that any criticism of
floyd is constructive or at least balanced. The exception is that more leeway will be given to topics that have titles that indicate that they are anti-Landis. In any case, I will take a dim view to any comments concerning Landis's family.
There has been no bargain made between Landis and the site owner with regards to the moderating. Landis is recovering from surgery and is preparing his defense against doping allegations and decided to pay us a visit. The only bargain posited that I'm aware of is:
QUOTE(floyd @ Oct 8 2006, 10:58 AM)

You called it. Will and I have been reading these from the begining and while you guys are opinionated (as am I) we decided that, if given the info, you would be constructive. We'll call it the Wikipedia defense, and I would have given everything to you sooner but had a very hard time selling the idea to the lawyers.
That was proposed to all of the members.
A note here on libel. Libel shouldn't be an issue for this site as the members are encouraged to follow the forums rules and
guidelines. Individuals trying to sneak something nasty past the moderators should read the following:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,1737445,00.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libel