Burkni, on 24 May 2011 - 04:14 PM, said:
Nibali clearly stated in yesterday's press conference that he was now racing for 2nd. One can only speculate how good a race this would have been without Contador.
I'd like to think how good a race it could have been had riders like Evans, the Schleck's, Horner (the second best climber after AC

), Gesink, Leipheimer, Sammy Sanchez, Vino, etc. would have showed up to challenge or if guys like DiLuca and Menchov would have arrived in much better form than they did, but it is what it is. I suppose next year Zomegan could tell AC to stay home, as his services will not be needed if the organizers and or the fans would prefer a close or more hotly contested GC. Of course, the other option is to make the parcours less favorable to AC should he return. One way to do that would be to eliminate all TT's and mountain top finishes. In fact, when the race goes into the mountains you could have those stages finish on a steep descent to help Nibali's chances, but then it wouldn't be the Giro.
I don't have a problem watching a dominate rider put his full talents on display. Much like Cancellara's dominance and strength in the cobbled classics, AC's superiority in the GT's is a beautiful thing to watch for me. You can have very tight and close GT where all the top GC contenders watch and mark each other, but provide little in the way of aggression, a la the year Sastre won the Tour (yawn!) or you can have a GT such as this where one rider is head and shoulders above the rest and is out proving it each day.
I've thoroughly enjoyed the racing the past several stages - especially Sunday's stage, which saw all kinds of crazy things take place out on the road. I would have loved to have seen the riders tackle the climb and descent of the Crostis on Saturday, but the climb up the Zoncolan was fun to watch and no less impacted despite its exclusion.
Whatever AC's ultimate winning margin is, I think the Giro has been great and hope that the Tour comes close to it for drama and aggressive racing.