Daily Peloton Forums: Do I have your attention now? - Daily Peloton Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Do I have your attention now?

#41 User is offline   DPCandND 

  • Moderator
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 1,068
  • Joined: 10-July 06
  • Location:SoCal

Posted 05 June 2009 - 07:50 PM

QUOTE(zekeydekey @ Jun 3 2009, 06:12 AM) View Post

Richard Wadsworth.



Oh, now I get it....geez, people, let's keep it simple for the old folks, okay?
0

#42 User is offline   TFF 

  • Team Mechanic
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 576
  • Joined: 01-December 07
  • Location:Tar Heel Heaven, NC
  • Interests:Snuggly warm couch potato.

Posted 06 June 2009 - 01:34 AM

QUOTE(vanishingPoint @ Jun 2 2009, 10:14 AM) View Post

I reported this post as offensive. If any moderators condone this sort of labeling, please have the decency to make it known. Otherwise I expect an explanation for censoring my posts.

My actual reply was moderated merely because I complemented TFF for posting a photo of his wife.


And all I did was compliment VP on the tranny he took home the other night. But come to think if it, it must be a picture of ChrisH's girlfriend.

This post has been edited by TFF: 06 June 2009 - 10:08 AM

0

#43 User is offline   CAMPYBOB 

  • Cat-3
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,873
  • Joined: 30-April 06

Posted 07 June 2009 - 08:11 PM

CampyBob (borderline convict, future gun-nut holed up in cabin shooting at the ATF)

convict? not hardly. i hold a class 7 federal fiearms license and pay the SOT (special occupation tax, as a licensed manufacture and seller of machineguns up to and including .50 cal. BMG).

future gun nut? since age 10. 46 years ago.

shooting at the atf? no, i don't think so. they have my fingerprints, color passport photos and the combinations to my safes. beside, one of their compliance division agents that audits my corporation is kinda hot.

in this country you can do things legally and dot every i and cross every t or you can do 10 years in club fed. there's no bicycle training facilities in club fed, so i make damn sure i walk the right side of the line.

as far as doping in cycling goes, keep putting me firmly in the 'i don't give a fook' catagory...other than lmao at the terminally concerned, which provides me with hours of laughter and entertainment.

and as far as insults go, i can give as good as i get and i normally just ignore the morons, but the trashing of vp and ali has gone far beyond obnoxious and the moral equivocating of the issue just spotlights the criminally stoopid.



0

#44 User is offline   Chris E 

  • Cat-4
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,606
  • Joined: 08-July 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, Texas USA
  • Interests:Fishing, boating, travelling, golf.

Posted 10 June 2009 - 03:14 AM

You would give a fook if all of a sudden in your industry it was the norm to cheat and thus deny you income or glory unless you also started cheating. Being a Republican you may not give a fook and just join in so maybe that is what drives your view on this issue.

But that is the gist of alot of the opinion in here....the non-ability of those who wish to compete clean within the rules to be competitive.

Ali and vp get what they deserve. I am sure they have thick skins so I am not concerned. I feel sorry for those that take them seriously and take the bait every time. I just read them for comedic value usually.

0

#45 User is offline   vanishingPoint 

  • Cat-4
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,506
  • Joined: 30-April 06
  • Location:N.A.

Posted 10 June 2009 - 02:41 PM

QUOTE(Chris E @ Jun 9 2009, 11:14 PM) View Post
But that is the gist of alot of the opinion in here....the non-ability of those who wish to compete clean within the rules to be competitive.


If the real issue is doping then it would behoove anti-dopers to stick to the topic, not lift tabloid articles and present them as fact, not use irrelevant personality distinctions in place of substance, not spite your own with the subtle, snide, rhetoric.




0

#46 User is offline   frenchfry 

  • Cat-2
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,195
  • Joined: 03-August 06
  • Location:France

Posted 10 June 2009 - 03:02 PM

QUOTE(vanishingPoint @ Jun 10 2009, 04:41 PM) View Post

If the real issue is doping then it would behoove anti-dopers to stick to the topic, not lift tabloid articles and present them as fact, not use irrelevant personality distinctions in place of substance, not spite your own with the subtle, snide, rhetoric.

definition of tabloid: any journalistic outlet that prints negative articles about Hope Rides Again.

The question is: are there any non-tabloids left?
0

Share this topic:


  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users