Am I Missing something?
#181
Posted 22 October 2007 - 11:03 PM
#182
Posted 22 October 2007 - 11:09 PM
This post has been edited by admt: 22 October 2007 - 11:13 PM
#184
Posted 23 October 2007 - 12:41 AM
We've all got agendas.
Maybe, maybe not. Only time will tell.
I look forward to you contributing anything.
I don't know, but he just contributed one of the best plays on words yet.
At least you could pop one of these.
When someone pins me like that, I always get a good laugh.
Dave.
Landis also alleged that Armstrong helped him understand how the drugs worked
#185
Posted 23 October 2007 - 01:47 AM
the moderators frown on such personal attacks.
which is exactly what is happening in almost all these posts.
I was talking about Contador and Bruyneel.
We already appear to have links between A.C. and O.P. Let's see if they are next year's doping casualty. Let's hope not, but crossing my fingers stopped working somewhere around Stage 17.
Then again, your +1 could also have been for Ivan Basso...
Please offer what edits are required for accuracy.
1. Riis -- admitted
2. Ullrich -- suspended
3. Vino -- Stage 13 & 15 stripped after testing positive in the Tour, team withdrew
4. Ras -- Yellow stripped, kicked out and fired for misreporting whereabouts (a doping violation), additional allegations pending
5. Floyd -- err, see 2:1 decision
6. Oscar -- Given yellow jersey for a Tour where he had two positives for Salbutamol, subsequently ruled admissable (also possible linkage to O.P., but who is counting)
How about a #7?
7. Add also Ivan Basso -- GC leader for Disco, removed just before Tour start, admitted and suspended.
Looks pretty accurate to me.
Dave.
what about Lance.... since everyone else gets an invite how about LA?
maybe you have an agenda . . .
I do but it is not what you think..
try Noam Chomsky he may help you out with that Gitmo thingie.
#186
Posted 23 October 2007 - 03:52 AM
which is exactly what is happening in almost all these posts.
what about Lance.... since everyone else gets an invite how about LA?
...
Apparently I need ChrisH's permission to add him to the list. Of course, then there will be a couple of objections from the Usual Suspects (great movie).
Dave.
Landis also alleged that Armstrong helped him understand how the drugs worked
#187
Posted 27 October 2007 - 11:46 PM
What are you complaining about. I used to headline these lists. Elevated and singled out by the likes of dbrower. Now I have apparently dropped so low that I didn't even get an honorable mention.
Even FF got in there and I didn't. Heck, his handle even says he is French and we all hate the French. Right?
I'm going to report a union greivance.
Dave.
Yes, an obvious but not intended overlook on my part.
DQ, you fall in there somewhere. Maybe I should just shake up the list of uncouth and post again....
#188
Posted 28 October 2007 - 01:18 AM
Yes, an obvious but not intended overlook on my part.
DQ, you fall in there somewhere. Maybe I should just shake up the list of uncouth and post again....
well yeah shake it up .... nothing like a good round or two.
ON MY WAY TO ABU DABI.... looks like these rich peeps want to hit oil or something.
#189
Posted 31 October 2007 - 11:29 PM
Apparently I need ChrisH's permission to add him to the list. Of course, then there will be a couple of objections from the Usual Suspects (great movie).
Dave.
Getting on people's lists is not the be-all and end-all of life. So what !, if your name wasn't mentioned in a set which included many wankers (although I must confess that you should have been there). We can't always get what we want in this life.
Dave, you are lost. I could help you find yourself, but I think I'll just sit back and enjoy the ride ... laughs galore !
Respect, Ali
#190
Posted 01 November 2007 - 12:32 AM
Getting on people's lists is not the be-all and end-all of life. So what !, if your name wasn't mentioned in a set which included many wankers (although I must confess that you should have been there). We can't always get what we want in this life.
Dave, you are lost. I could help you find yourself, but I think I'll just sit back and enjoy the ride ... laughs galore !
Respect, Ali
As we continue with much ado about nothing, a statement which would actually be on topic, when we are talking about lists this is as solid an example as we can get here:
... I would exclude chris_t, DQ, amifan and bellabici from the list of candidates.
-dB
That is a list where I could even graciously concede first place.
Dave.
Landis also alleged that Armstrong helped him understand how the drugs worked
#191
Posted 01 November 2007 - 04:29 PM
That is a list where I could even graciously concede first place.
Dave.
I was about to join your list. But not when you're a runner up. Ha-ha-ha.
#193
Posted 01 November 2007 - 07:29 PM
... I would exclude chris_t, DQ, amifan and bellabici from the list of candidates.
-dB
Ah, yes, a classic.
#194
Posted 01 November 2007 - 11:09 PM
I was about to join your list. But not when you're a runner up. Ha-ha-ha.
Inbox chris_t? He has voluntarily left his position vacant.
Dave.
Landis also alleged that Armstrong helped him understand how the drugs worked

Help











