[strbuk]

Go to floydlandis.com and access the link for audio and video of last week's presentation.

Paula

[dbrower]

Go to floydlandis.com and access the link for audio and video of last week's presentation.

Paula

I've mirrored these to archive.org, where they've been recoded to other
formats as well, with streaming.

http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/wedne...roundup_25.html

-dB

[amykate]

i tried to download the video, but only got the audio...anyhoo... it was nice to "hear'' the doc explain all the mumbo jumbo. I can't understand why WADA allows different countries to have different standards for a positive result? Dosen't the W in WADA stand for world???? How can the australian/american/european labs have different qualifications for a positive result??? OK, I am a FIRM believer that Floyd is INNOCEnt. Now that i/we hear these amazing lab fluctuations pertaining to possible contamination and obviously fluctuating values that according to WADA's own definitions of a pos. results....this is beyond comprension to me. How did it even get this far? This really ticks me off, as i am sure i am not alone on this. But c'mon, all these journalists that judge a man by one report of a leaked positive result, gimme a break. Since you reported the "positive'' result so quickly, it didn't give you the time or the brains to stop and think maybe, just maybe this guy is a victim of a piss poor (pardon the pun) system that can not consistantly/accurately judge if a man is honest or not. Test him in Australia by WADA's standards there and he is negative. EXplain that to me. This just REEEEEEKS of too many cooks in the friggin kitchen. Who's kitchen is it??? It belongs to Floyd. Dammit, this is your Kitchen....start cookin Floyd, I am hungry!!